During development I encountered a caveat: Opus 4.5 can’t test or view a terminal output, especially one with unusual functional requirements. But despite being blind, it knew enough about the ratatui terminal framework to implement whatever UI changes I asked. There were a large number of UI bugs that likely were caused by Opus’s inability to create test cases, namely failures to account for scroll offsets resulting in incorrect click locations. As someone who spent 5 years as a black box Software QA Engineer who was unable to review the underlying code, this situation was my specialty. I put my QA skills to work by messing around with miditui, told Opus any errors with occasionally a screenshot, and it was able to fix them easily. I do not believe that these bugs are inherently due to LLM agents being better or worse than humans as humans are most definitely capable of making the same mistakes. Even though I myself am adept at finding the bugs and offering solutions, I don’t believe that I would inherently avoid causing similar bugs were I to code such an interactive app without AI assistance: QA brain is different from software engineering brain.
Shropshire Council said an April launch would place it under "significant financial risk".
。WPS官方版本下载是该领域的重要参考
Maciej Piętowski
《解放軍報》稱此次清洗將「推動人民軍隊換羽重生」。，推荐阅读Line官方版本下载获取更多信息
Зеленский сделал признание о многолетней проблеме ВСУЗеленский: Дефицит военных ВСУ серьезный и продолжается не один год, они устали。爱思助手下载最新版本是该领域的重要参考
a host computer that is some distance away or, even worse, in The Cloud.